Coaching & Leadership

Why Coaching Works (and When It Doesn't)

24 Mar 2026·8 min read
Why Coaching Works (and When It Doesn't)

title: "Why Coaching Works (and When It Doesn't)" meta_title: "Why Coaching Works and When It Doesn't: An Honest Guide" meta_description: "Coaching isn't therapy, training, or mentoring. After years of professional coaching, here's an honest take on what it actually does, who it's for, and when something else would serve you better." slug: /blog/why-coaching-works-and-when-it-doesnt author: Alun Davies-Baker date: 2023-06-20 updated: 2026-03-XX keywords: coaching benefits, professional coaching, agile coaching, executive coaching, when to get a coach, coaching vs mentoring, ICF coaching categories: Coaching & Leadership og_title: "Why Coaching Works (and When It Doesn't)" og_description: "Coaching isn't magic. It's a structured way of thinking clearly. Here's an honest take on when it helps, when it doesn't, and why it matters more in 2026." schema_type: Article excerpt: "Coaching isn't therapy, training, or mentoring, and it isn't magic. After years of professional coaching, here's an honest take on what it actually does, who it's for, who it's not for, and why the current moment of AI-driven change makes it more relevant than ever." seo_title: "Why Coaching Works and When It Doesn't: An Honest Guide" seo_description: "Coaching isn't therapy, training, or mentoring. After years of professional coaching, here's an honest take on what it actually does, who it's for, and when something else would serve you better."

Why Coaching Works (and When It Doesn't)

A client came to me last year convinced she needed to leave her job. She was a programme manager at a large financial institution, well-respected, well-paid, and completely stuck. She'd been going round in circles for months. She'd talked to friends. She'd talked to her partner. Everyone had advice. None of it helped.

In our first session I didn't give her advice either. I asked her what she'd already tried. I asked her what she was afraid of. I asked her what would change if she stayed. Then I asked her what would change if she left.

She talked for forty minutes. By the end she wasn't stuck any more. She didn't leave her job. She went back and had a conversation with her director that she'd been avoiding for six months. The problem wasn't the job. It was a conversation she hadn't had.

I didn't solve that. She did. My job was to create the conditions where she could think clearly enough to solve it herself.

That's what coaching is. And it's also what coaching isn't, which is just as important to understand.

What Coaching Actually Is

My perspective as a coach is simple: you already have the skills and knowledge to find solutions to your problems. You don't need me to tell you what to do. You need space and time to think clearly, and someone who will ask the questions you're not asking yourself.

I'm very much aligned with Nancy Kline's concept of the Thinking Environment: the idea that the quality of everything we do depends on the quality of the thinking we do first, and that the quality of our thinking depends on the way we treat each other while we're thinking.[^1] My role is to create that environment. To listen without judgment. To ask reflective questions. To hold the space and resist the temptation to fill it with my own opinions.

This is harder than it sounds, for both of us. For me, because after years of experience I often can see a possible answer and have to consciously not give it. For the client, because sitting with your own thinking without someone rescuing you is uncomfortable. The discomfort is where the growth happens.

What Coaching Is Not

This matters because the terms get confused constantly, and the confusion leads to disappointment.

Coaching is not mentoring. A mentor shares their experience and advises you based on what worked for them. "I've been in your situation, here's what I did." That's valuable, but it's not coaching. It's someone else's answer to someone else's version of your problem.

Coaching is not training. Training gives you knowledge and skills you don't yet have. If you don't know how to facilitate a retrospective, you need training, not coaching. Coaching assumes you have the capability. It helps you access it.

Coaching is not consulting. A consultant diagnoses your problem and recommends a solution. They bring expertise you don't have. Coaching assumes the expertise is yours.

Coaching is not therapy. Therapy addresses psychological conditions and past trauma. If what you're dealing with is clinical anxiety, depression, or unresolved trauma, you need a therapist, not a coach. A good coach recognises this boundary and refers you when appropriate.

I say all this not to be precious about definitions, but because choosing the wrong type of support wastes time and money. If you need training, coaching won't give you the skills. If you need coaching, training won't unlock the thinking. Knowing which you need is the first step.

When Coaching Works

In my experience, coaching works best in specific conditions:

When you know enough but can't see clearly. You have the knowledge, the experience, and the capability, but something is blocking you. It might be a limiting belief, an unexamined assumption, a fear you haven't named, or simply the fact that you've been too close to the problem for too long. A coaching conversation creates distance and clarity.

When you're navigating a transition. A new role, a restructured team, a shift in responsibility, a career decision. Transitions force you to rethink how you work and what you want. Coaching provides a structured space to do that thinking rather than figuring it out on the fly.

When you need accountability, not advice. You know what you should do. You're not doing it. A coach won't tell you what to do (you already know). They'll help you understand why you're not doing it and hold you accountable for following through.

When the problem is about people, not process. A difficult stakeholder relationship, a team that isn't gelling, a manager you can't read, a colleague you're in conflict with. These are human problems. They don't respond to frameworks or methodologies. They respond to self-awareness, perspective-taking, and honest reflection, all of which coaching develops.

When Coaching Doesn't Work

I'd rather lose a potential client by being honest than gain one by overpromising. Coaching doesn't work in these situations:

When you lack the foundational knowledge. If someone asks me to coach them on agile ways of working but they've never been part of an agile team and don't understand the basic concepts, they don't need coaching. They need training first. Coaching builds on existing capability. It doesn't create it from scratch.

When you're not willing to be uncomfortable. Coaching works by holding up a mirror. If you're not ready to look at what's reflected, the process stalls. This isn't a character flaw. It might just mean the timing isn't right.

When what you need is a decision made for you. Some people come to coaching wanting someone to tell them what to do. That's not what coaching provides. If you want an expert opinion, hire a consultant. If you want someone to help you form your own opinion, that's coaching.

When the problem is clinical. Persistent anxiety, depression, burnout that has crossed into a mental health condition. These need professional therapeutic support. I take this boundary seriously. A coach who doesn't is a coach to avoid.

Why This Matters More in 2026

The current moment has created a specific kind of confusion that coaching is particularly well-suited to address.

AI is changing roles faster than people can process. I'm coaching people right now whose jobs look fundamentally different from twelve months ago. Tasks they spent years mastering are now done by AI in seconds. Their identity was tied to that craft. The question "what am I for now?" is not a training question or a consulting question. It's a coaching question.

The pace of change is outrunning people's ability to make sense of it. Decisions that used to unfold over months are happening in weeks. The leaders I work with aren't struggling with a lack of information. They're struggling with too much information and not enough time to think. Creating space to think clearly, which is exactly what coaching does, has become a competitive advantage rather than a luxury.

Autonomy is being compressed. AI-assisted workflows often standardise how work gets done. For people whose core motivator is freedom or mastery, this creates a tension they can feel but can't always name. Coaching helps them name it, which is the first step to addressing it. (For more on how motivators are shifting, see What Actually Motivates Your Team.)

Imposter syndrome is intensifying. When AI can produce in minutes what used to take you hours, the question "am I still needed?" becomes louder. The answer is almost always yes, but not for the reasons you think. Coaching helps people find the new answer. (For more on this, see Overcome Imposter Syndrome - 4 Ways Coaching Can Help.)

How I Work

If any of this resonates, here's what working with me looks like.

We start with a chemistry session, a short initial conversation to introduce ourselves, discuss what you're looking for, and see whether coaching is the right fit. There's no commitment and no cost. If coaching isn't what you need, I'll tell you, and I'll suggest what might be.

If we decide to work together, we agree on a structure: how often we meet, what we're working towards, and how we'll know it's working. Sessions are typically 60 to 90 minutes. The number of sessions varies, but most coaching engagements run for three to six months.

Between sessions, the work continues. Coaching isn't something that happens to you for an hour every fortnight. It's a way of thinking that you practise between conversations. The sessions provide the catalyst. The change happens in the days and weeks that follow.

If you'd like to explore whether coaching could help, book a chemistry session. I'd be happy to have a conversation about what's on your mind.


Related reading:


References

[^1]: Nancy Kline, Time to Think: Listening to Ignite the Human Mind, Cassell, 1999. Kline's work on the Thinking Environment identifies ten components of the conditions under which people think best, including attention, equality, ease, and encouragement.


Alun Davies-Baker is an agile coach, trainer, and the founder of Altogether Agile. He is an ICF Associate Certified Coach who helps individuals and teams navigate complexity, build confidence, and work more effectively.